Legal Opinion

Barney v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1926No. 25,199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action to determine adverse claims which resulted below in findings and order for judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.

The tract in question is quadrangular in shape and on the east bank of the Minnesota river in Mankato. Adjoining on the east are the mainline tracks of defendant and the union passenger depot. The Minnesota river at this point runs somewhat east of north and the railroad tracks are roughly parallel. Those of defendant are for the most part on ground which concededly it has a right to occupy. It has extended the use of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. The" Abbotsford"Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Bidwell v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  4. Portland & Willamette Valley R. R. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Saint Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lieser v. Town of St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API