Legal Opinion

Cammer v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948No. 16159PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

StukES, Justice:

Respondent, who is a young woman about twenty-four, recovered against appellants verdict and judgment for $25,-000.00 actual damages and $5,000.00 punitive damages in this personal injury action. The appeal is from adverse rulings upon timely motions in the trial court for nonsuit, directed verdict, new trial and judgment non obstante veredicto.

The present husband of respondent was an enlisted man in the navy and on leave in Charleston to marry her. The wedding was set for Feb. 8, 1946 and on the night.of Feb. 6 they were engaged in making arrangements for the event and in his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Bowers v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Carter v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  5. Bishop v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Campus Sweater & Sportswear Co. v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  2. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Jennings v. McCowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Vernon v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API