Hartley v. Hartley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
The husband, appellee here, seeks a divorce for cruelty and indignities. The master recommended that a decree be refused. The court below, without filing an opinion, sustained exceptions to the master’s report, and granted a divorce for indignities. After the respondent appealed, the court below, pursuant to our Rule 58, filed an opinion in which, inter alia, it said: “The testimony establishes one absolute certainty, that these people were incompatible and that it was impossible for them to get along as husband and wife. When we read the testimony and report of the master,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Daly v. DalySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Knox v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Mentser v. MentserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Cobaugh v. CobaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fawcett v. FawcettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Rech v. RechSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Politylo v. PolityloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Oliver v. OliverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Glass v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.