Legal Opinion
Rose Hill Poultry Corp. v. American Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 5, 1977No. 764SC1021PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Plaintiff bottoms its claim against the insurer on G.S. 20-279.21 (f)(1) which in pertinent part provides:
“(f) Every motor vehicle liability policy shall be subject to the following provisions which need not be contained therein:(1) Except as hereinafter provided, the liability of the insurance carrier with respect to the insurance required by this Article shall become absolute whenever injury or damage covered by said motor vehicle liability policy occurs; said policy may not be canceled or annulled as to such liability by any agreement between the insurance carrier and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hawley v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. SlaytonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- South Carolina Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- South Carolina Insurance v. Hallmark Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Sturdivant v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003