Legal Opinion

Devaucene v. Devaucene

New York Court of Chancery

Decided February 6, 1832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The decree in this case had set aside a deed conveying real estate in the village of Brooklyn, and directed the defendants to reconvey .the property to the complainant and give up possession. They had made default in doing so; and Mr. David Graham, on the part of the complainant, now moved for a writ of assistance and for such other relief as the court might see proper to g;rant.

Read the full summary

The decree in this case had set aside a deed conveying real estate in the village of Brooklyn, and directed the defendants to reconvey .the property to the complainant and give up possession. They had made default in doing so; and Mr. David Graham, on the part of the complainant, now moved for a writ of assistance and for such other relief as the court might see proper to g;rant. The motion was founded upon the following documents: Notice of the motion and affidavit of personal service of a copy of the same and of the other papers; A certified copy of the decree; Certificate of the.enrolment…

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Cancellor.

Take a writ of assistance; and let an attachment issue, in case the deed be not executed within ten days.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lehigh Zinc & Iron Co. v. TrotterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  3. Rawiszer v. HamiltonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
  4. Schenck v. ConoverNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1860
  5. King v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API