Legal Opinion

Town of Hudson v. (69 CVS 448) City of Lenoir

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1971No. 104PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Hudson contends it acquired prior and exclusive jurisdiction to annex the disputed area because it was first to pass a resolution of intent to annex the Joyceton area and Lenoir could not therefore proceed with voluntary annexation. Hudson relies on the majority rule stated in 2 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d Ed., 1966), § 7.22a, which reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

“The rule that among separate equivalent proceedings relating to the same subject matter, that one which is prior in time is prior in jurisdiction to the exclusion of those subsequently instituted,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Smith v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. Consolidated Foods Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. City of Burlington v. Town of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Town of Spencer v. Town of East SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API