Legal Opinion

Wells v. Wells

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a suit on a promissory note. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $979.76 and the defendant, Klepper, has appealed.

The facts show that for sometime prior to August 25, 1922, plaintiff, Mary E. Wells, and defendant, Ed. L. Wells, who were husband and wife, were in partnership in the retail drug business in St. Joseph, Missouri, each owning a one-half interest in the business. Mrs. Wells was a silent partner, the entire business being transacted by her husband in his own name, there being no evidence of any kind from which the public would be led to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burke v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. DeBerry v. WheelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Lyons v. MurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  4. Miller v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Hogan & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers Savings Bank v. PughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API