Legal Opinion

Torrence v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2008No. 2007-SC-000586-MRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT

A jury found Lawrence Torrence guilty of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree and recommended a cumulative forty-year sentence. After the trial judge sentenced him in accordance with the jury’s recommendation, Torrence filed this matter-of-right appeal. 1

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.

Torrence’s appeal raises three issues related to the trial of his case that he argues require reversal of his convictions. First, he contends that the Commonwealth engaged in prosecutorial misconduct when it called him an “admitted felon” during its closing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Slaughter v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Matthews v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. West v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Mayo v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Earl K. Johnson v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Kendall D. Lincoln v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API