Legal Opinion
United States v. Bruce Howard Neckels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 26, 1971No. 71-1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in a court trial for violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462 [refusal to submit to induction into the Armed Forces]. He appeals. We affirm.
FIRST ISSUE
Relying upon United States v. Baray, 445 F.2d 949 (9th Cir.1971), and similar cases, appellant asserts that his conviction cannot stand by reason of the failure of the local board to provide him with a medical interview as outlined in 32 C.F.R. § 1628.2(b). 1
In November, 1966, appellant was given his first preinduction physical and was found fully qualified for induction. He was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kenneth Gerald Storey, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Gregory Drew HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Raymond Keith Skinner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Roger Sutton SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Juan Manuel BarayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. John Christopher D'ArceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Kevin Patrick FordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Robert Sol LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. BulgerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- United States v. John Christopher D'ArceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.