Foster v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
In the argument in support of the motion for new trial it is strenuously insisted that the' decision of the court is contrary to the rule laid down in a decision by the Supreme Court, one made by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and also another by the Board of Tax Appeals. As no reference was made to these cases in the original opinion, it is thought best to show why the court did not mention them.
Special reliance is placed upon the case of Helvering v. Canfield, 291 U.S. 163, 54 S.Ct. 368, 370, 78 L.Ed. 706, and it will be admitted that the opinion in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hellmich v. HellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Helvering v. CanfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Harter v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Horrmann v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
- Stewart v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foster v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938