Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1913No. 2360PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.. While the testimony offered in behalf of the State is not very satisfactory, the State relying on the testimony of Joe Jonak and his wife to connect defendant with the offense (there being many conflicts in the testimony of these two witnesses), yet the jury solved the question in favor of the State, and the testimony of these two witnesses as to the material facts, if true, would support the verdict; therefore, we would not feel authorized to disturb the verdict…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyles v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Denning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API