Nowak v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Upon a former appeal (249 N. Y. 78) we held that the question, “ Have you ever consulted a physician? ” following the question, “ Are you in good health? ” might justly have been taken by the assured to mean “ Have you ever consulted a physician in respect to ailments affecting your general health? ” and, therefore, that the assured, in answering “ No,” may have told the truth. We see no reason for altering our views. It is not to be supposed, however, that the particular holding is authority for the proposition that, in all cases, questions as to consultations with a physician must be taken…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nowak v. Brotherhood of American YeomenNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jenkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Anderson v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kirschner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- New York Life Insurance v. BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Goldstein v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.