Legal Opinion

In re Metallic Specialty Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1912No. 4,189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In the matter of the Metallic Specialty Manufacturing Company, bankrupt. On certificate, of the referee for review of an order refusing confirmation of a sale.

1Opinion of the Court

J, B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

[1, 2] The order complained of is as follows:

“And now, January 24, 1912, the testimony having been concluded, the referee enters the following order: It appearing from the record that Theodore Dimmick has made a bid of $20,000 and has deposited $10,000 thereon, that his attorney has stated of record that he agreed to bid this price- at either public or private sale, and it appearing that there are other bidders who are willing to bid besides Theodore Dimmick, and the majority in num*301her and. amount of creditors desiring a resale, confirmation of tlie sale to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Sturgiss v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Stanley Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Jacobsohn v. LarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  3. In Re KarpeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. In Re Blue Coal Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. In re American Beaver Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API