Legal Opinion
Schafer v. UnionBank/Central
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 18, 2012No. 3-11-0008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Schafer v. UnionBank/Central,
2012 IL App (3d) 110008
Appellate Court JAMES B. SCHAFER and MARY E. SCHAFER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Caption v. UNIONBANK/CENTRAL, a/k/a UnionBank Princeton, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee (Hatzer and Nordstrom, a Corporation, Defendant). District & No. Third District Docket No. 3-11-0008 Filed July 18, 2012 Held Plaintiffs’ pleadings were sufficient to state a cause of action for (Note: This syllabus conversion against defendant bank and the Credit Agreements Act did not constitutes no part of preclude plaintiffs from…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Maksimovic v. TsogalisIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Forsythe v. Clark USA, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Broberg v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brent Bauer v. Qwest Communications CorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Metropolitan Capital Bank & Trust v. BarketDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025