Legal Opinion

Fonseca v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamons, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding instituted by petitioners Anthony Fonseca and William S’Doia, doing business as S. & D. Construction Company, against the Board of Education of the Rome City School District and B. S. McCarey Company, Inc., respondents.

The respondent Board of Education of Rome awarded the general contract for the construction of a 29-room elementary school in the City of Rome in August, 1968. Petitioners contend that their hid, submitted on August 1, 1968 in the amount of $968,000, was the lowest bid submitted. On August 8, 1968 the respondent. Boar^ of Education of Rome…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haskell-Gilroy, Inc. v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Southern Steel Co. v. County of SuffolkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Premier Electric Installation Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Gallagher GMC Sales Corp. v. Central School District No. 1 of WappingerNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. S. S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. PhalenNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Jose Construction Group, Inc. v. Loudoun County School BoardLoudoun County Circuit Court · 1998
  2. Hickey Ford Sales, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Le Chase Construction Corp. v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API