Morse v. Blanchard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Charles Morse against Duane Blanchard, impleaded with Elmer E. Johnson, on a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.
Plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit against the defendants, declaring upon the common counts. A bill of particulars being demanded, he furnished one, declaring his demand to be upon a promissory note dated November 3, 1894, for J>150, due one year from date *38thereof, with interest at 8 per cent., and signed by defendants. Blanchard was an accommodation maker. The defense was that plaintiff had extended the time of payment without the consent of Blanchard, and had thereby released him from liability. The case was tried without a jury, and the court made a finding of facts and law, and rendered…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Alexander v. BlackburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- J. H. Robinson Truck Lines, Inc. v. RaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Boland v. DolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Falletti v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of the United Workmen v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.