Legal Opinion

Firence Footwear Co. v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1966No. 14909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion for Rehearing

BELL, Chief Justice.

The opinion on Defendants in error’s motion to dismiss heretofore handed down is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted.

A default judgment was rendered in favor of Leonard Campbell and his wife, Florence, against Firence Footwear Company. The defendant filed with the Clerk of the trial court his petition for writ of error.

The defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because, among other things, the petition fails to name all persons adversely affected.

The petition states: “The plaintiffs in said cause are the adverse…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weems & Waldo v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Houston Gas & Fuel Co. v. SpradlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Hill v. KelseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Roberts v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Padgitt v. Ft. Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Few v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Taylor v. Gilbert Gertner EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Firence Footwear Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Weatherford v. ElizondoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API