Legal Opinion
Sawyer v. Robson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 22, 2006No. 05-372PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.
¶ 1. Landlords Bruce Robson and Antonio Latona appeal the superior court’s decision granting tenant Samantha Sawyer’s motion for a new trial based on the court’s conclusion that the jury had returned an inconsistent verdict. Tenant cross-appeals the superior court’s decision granting landlords’ motion to dismiss tenant’s claim asserted under the Consumer Fraud Act and its denial of her motion for a directed verdict. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
¶ 2. The following facts are undisputed. In 2003, Latona purchased a mobile home for $900 and placed it on Robson’s land. Latona began…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- L'ESPERANCE v. BenwareSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Carter v. GugliuzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Human Rights Commission v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Hunter Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foti Fuels, Inc. v. Kurrle Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Foti Fuels, Inc. and Robert A. Foti v. Kurrle Corporation, Payjack, LLC and James J. KurrleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Glassford v. Dufresne & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Sawyer v. RobsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Knutsen v. DionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.