Gibson v. Swanson Plating & Machine of Kentucky, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUGHTREY, Justice.
This is an appeal by the Second Injury Fund from the trial court’s determination that the Fund is liable for a portion of the workers’ compensation award to the plaintiff, Floyd Gibson. The Fund contends that the chancellor erred in finding that Gibson had filed his claim against the Fund within the one-year statute of limitations. We agree with the chancellor’s ruling that the claim was not barred by the statute of limitations and affirm.
Resolution of this controversy requires us to determine when the statute of limitations began to run. In making this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Charles C. Hodge v. Service MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Travelers Insurance Company v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Collier v. GoesslingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Henwood v. McCallum & Robinson, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Armistead v. Clarksville-Montgomery County School SystemTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Braswell v. AC & S, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Pearson v. Day International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- American Water Heater Company v. The Taylor Winfield CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
- David R. Smith v. The Tennessee National GuardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017