Legal Opinion

Harold Chapman and Autumn Manor, Inc. v. United States of America, Department of Health & Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1987No. 85-2557PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This case requires us to interpret the Civil Monetary Penalties Law (CMPL) in the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a (1986) (as amended). In particular, we must determine for the first time whether the monetary double assessments provided for under the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Thompson v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Horras v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Douglas v. BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Donald O. BERNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Billings v. Wyoming Board of Outfitters & Professional GuidesWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API