Legal Opinion · Dissent

AMCO Insurance Co. v. Sills

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2007No. 05CA2683Published

1Dissent

Judge VOGT

dissenting.

Although I conclude, for the reasons set forth below, that appellant, Jimmy Sills, is not entitled to relief on his contentions of error, I disagree with the majority's conclusion that he was not substantially aggrieved by the declaratory judgment and therefore lacks standing to appeal.

"A non-party has standing to appeal an order of the trial court following entry of a final judgment if it appears that the nonparty was substantially aggrieved by the order." Bush v. Winker, 907 P.2d 79, 81 (Colo.1995) (non-party appellant was substantially aggrieved by default judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Wilson v. Board of Regents of the University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Borer v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Bush v. WinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API