Legal Opinion

Brust v. International Harvester Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1956No. 528Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT:

This is an action in which the plaintiff is seeking the right to participate in the benefits accorded to an injured employee under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the defendant being a self-insurer. The principal error relied upon by counsel for the appellant has been stated by him as follows:

2. The Court of Common Pleas erred in overruling the motion of the defendant to render judgment in favor of the defendant upon the special verdict returned by the jury.

The record reveals that the jury returned the following special verdict upon which judgment for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Looker v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API