In re Halstead & Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the bankruptcy proceedings of Halstead & Go., bankrupt. On petition to review a referee’s order allowing part and disallowing part of the claim of James E. Ware & Sons.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon cross-petition to review an order of a referee, bearing date February 28, 1913, which confirmed another order of the same referee of like purport, bearing date February 19, 1912. One of the petitions for review is filed by James E. Ware & Sons, creditors of the bankrupt, whose claim was allowed by the referee in part and disallowed in part, and who complain of such disallowance. The other is filed by the trustee, who complains because of the allowance of any part of the claim of Ware & Sons. The claim in question is for architect fees…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hasbrouck v. WinklerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
- Jordan v. LavertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- James E. Ware & Son v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914