Raoul Hagen v. Doris J. Hagen
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
════════════
No. 07-1065
════════════
Raoul Hagen, Petitioner,
v.
Doris J. Hagen, Respondent
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
On Petition for Review from the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Argued January 14, 2009
Justice Brister, joined by Justice O’Neill and Justice Medina, dissenting.
The Court says this divorce decree did not divide VA disability pay, and even if it did it is binding because it was voidable rather than void. I disagree on both counts.
I would also try a little harder…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.