Legal Opinion

Raoul Hagen v. Doris J. Hagen

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2009No. 07-1065Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════

No. 07-1065

════════════

Raoul Hagen, Petitioner,

v.

Doris J. Hagen, Respondent

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

On Petition for Review from the

Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Argued January 14, 2009

Justice Brister, joined by Justice O’Neill and Justice Medina, dissenting.

The Court says this divorce decree did not divide VA disability pay, and even if it did it is binding because it was voidable rather than void. I disagree on both counts.

I would also try a little harder…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API