Legal Opinion

Weir v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 11, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

These are four actions of tort, the first one to recover for the death and conscious suffering of the owner and operator of an automobile and for damage to the automobile, and the remaining three to recover for the deaths and conscious suffering of the other occupants of the automobile, all resulting from a collision with a train of the defendant at a public crossing in North Grosvenordale, Connecticut.

The cases were first heard by an auditor whose findings of fact were not final and were then heard upon the auditor’s report and other evidence. The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Duggan v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Nehring v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Daley v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  5. Correnti v. CatinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weir v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROADMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API