United Brick & Tile Division of American-Marietta Co. v. Wilkinson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
Appellants here were named as defendants individually and as representatives of Laborers Local No. 663 AFL-CIO and Hoisting Engineers Local No. 101 AFL-CIO. We shall refer to these defendants as Unions. Respondent and plaintiff, United Brick & Tile Division of American-Marietta Company, is a producer, processor and distributor of brick and tile. Its home office is located in Chicago, but it operates plants at Harrisonville and at Raytown, Missouri. Both of these plants are involved in this litigation. The appeal, originally taken to the Supreme Court, was transferred to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Curtis v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Casteel v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960