Legal Opinion

Haas v. Haas

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1951No. 17,979PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

The appellee Mabel Haas, as the widow and sole heir at law of the late George Haas, brought this action to set aside his last will and testament on the grounds that it was executed through undue influence and that he lacked mental capacity to make it. The appellants are the brothers, sisters and a nephew of the said George Haas to whom he bequeathed substantial sums of money. They answered under Rule 1-3 and a second paragraph of answer wherein it is alleged that Mabel Haas, as the testator’s widow, failed to elect to take under the law within the time prescribed by statute and thereby…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Davis v. BabbIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Workman v. WorkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Bower v. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Walker v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gast v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Love v. HARRISIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Bohnke v. Estate of BohnkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API