Legal Opinion

Naud v. Astrue

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 3, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-1982-RBJPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiff Chris Naud’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). Jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). This dispute became ripe for decision by this Court upon the filing of plaintiffs Reply Brief on February 24, 2011. The Court apologizes to the parties for the delay in resolving the case.

Facts

Mr. Naud applied for disability benefits on August 1, 2006. R. at 77-79. His claim was denied in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. David W. Musgrave v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Franklin B. BERNAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Claireather M. Wilkins v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dominguez v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
  2. Joey I. Rodriguez v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  3. Powell v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API