Legal Opinion

Vilas v. Bushnell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1919No. 15034PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for TCiug county, French, J., entered November 15, 1917, in favor of the defendant, dismissing proceedings for the probate of a will, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

William B. Bushnell died in Wisconsin, July 5,1916, leaving a will, of which the appellant Rahr was appointed executor. The probate proceeding in the Wisconsin court was presented to the superior court of King county by certified copy, and a petition was filed for the appointment of the appellant Yilas to serve as administrator cum testamento annexo, the petition alleging that the heirs of William B. Bushnell were the respondent George M. Bushnell, his widow, and certain nephews and nieces mentioned in •the will. The will bears date of November 25, 1914, and recites that all the testator’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knowles v. SlocumWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jackson v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Meyers v. AlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Goldsworthy v. OliverWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Holly Street Land Co. v. BeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Steen v. Estate of WinebergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API