Legal Opinion

Skrypek v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2006Published

1Dissent

Kane, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent.

After respondents were unable to obtain the medical records of petitioner Randall R. Skrypek by the use of a medical authorization, respondents chose to obtain those records by means of a judicial subpoena issued without notice by a court that did not have jurisdiction to issue it (Matter of State Police Admin. Disciplinary Hearing on Apr. 27, 2004, 13 AD3d 884, 885-886 [2004]). Petitioners were justified in defending against respondents’ improper use of a subpoena. Under these circumstances, the resultant delay is directly attributable to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerber v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re State Police Administrative Disciplinary HearingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API