Legal Opinion

In Re Application of N.W. Bail Bonds

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2002No. 01-56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] This is an appeal from the partial forfeiture of a surety bond. We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Appellant Northwest Bail Bond, Inc. (Northwest) states the issue as follows:

Whether the District Court's decision to forfeit $5,000.00 of the $7,500.00 surety bond ... constituted an abuse of discretion.

Appellee State of Wyoming (State) phrases the issue in this manner:

Did the district court patently abuse its discretion in partially granting Northwest's motion to set aside the bail bond forfeiture?

FACTS

[¶ 3] Kristopher Bull (Bull) was scheduled to attend a probation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Basolo v. BasoloWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Teton County Youth Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. George B. Parr, Mary Elizabeth Ellis Saenz, Intervenor-Appellant, Clinton Manges, Surety, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. HedrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Action Bailbonds v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Beagle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Addison v. Albany Cnty.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bonds v. Albany Cnty.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Action Bailbonds v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API