Legal Opinion
Stone v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0010PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gerald Stone, proceeding pro se, has filed three separate complaints with this Court. Stone v. Dep’t of the Treasury, No. 11-cv-1992; Stone v. HUD, No. 11-cv-02070; Stone v. Holder, No. 12-cv-0010. 1 Defendants each move to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Stone v. Dep’t of the Treasury, 11-1992, [Dkt. #3]; Stone v. HUD, 11-2070, [Dkt. # 4], Stone v. Holder, 12-0010, [Dkt. # 4]. Because the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Cause of Action Institute v. EgglestonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Scruggs v. Bureau of Engraving & PrintingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Stone v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Stone v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.