Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1951No. 3489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Defendant having waived trial by jury a judge of the court of common pleas found defendant guilty of “making a false statement to obtain unemployment benefits” upon an indictment laid under §1345-60 (2a) GC, which provides inter alia:—

“No individual may serve a waiting period or be paid benefits for the duration of any period of unemployment with respect to which the administrator finds that such individual: * * *
“(2a) advocates,'or is a member of a party which advocates, the overthrow of our government by force. Every person filing a claim for benefits in accordance with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dworken v. Collopy, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1950
  2. Dworken v. Cleveland Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Dworken v. Board of EducationCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. First Unitarian Church v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. First Unitarian Church v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API