People v. Kalkman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— The defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit robbery.
The appeal is from the final judgment entered therein, and from an order denying a new trial.
It appeared at the trial that the prosecuting attorney had received information from which he supposed an attempt had been made to bribe one or more of the jurors, and upon the close of his testimony for the prosecution, he called A. J. Towner, one of the jurors impaneled in the case, and interrogated him in relation thereto.
The testimony of the juror failed to show the attempted bribery. Thereupon the prosecuting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. SamselsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.