Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Newland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 2001No. 00-16071; D.C. No. CV-99-03117-WHAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Appellant Rickey Alexander (“Alexander”) appeals the district court’s denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as untimely. Alexander argued before the district court that the statute of limitations found in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), was tolled because his prison law library did not contain a copy of AEDPA until well after the limitations period would have expired in his case. The district court, relying on the panel opinion in Whalem/Hunt v. Early, 204 F.3d 907, 909 (9th Cir.2000), held that inadequacies of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Rchard Early, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- James Darryl Allen v. Gail Lewis, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Anthony Lewis Whalem/hunt v. Richard Early, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- P and P Imports LLC v. Johnson Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Haynes North America, Inc. v. eManualOnline.comDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- P and P Imports LLC v. Johnson Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022