Legal Opinion

Van Antwerp v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1950No. 33293Published

1Opinion of the Court

203 Okla. 84 (1950)

217 P.2d 1034

VAN ANTWERP

v.

SCHULTZ et al.

No. 33293.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 18, 1950.

Rehearing Denied May 9, 1950.

Harry Moreland and S.J. Clendinning, both of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Coffey & Coffey and Byron V. Boone, all of Tulsa, for defendants in error Bertha Schultz and R.C. Schultz.

Geo. W. Reed, Jr., of Tulsa, for defendant in error Joseph E. Washington.

LUTTRELL, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs Bertha Schultz and R.C. Schultz against the defendants Atlas Investment Company, L.N. Van Antwerp, and Joseph E. Washington, to enforce collection of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Palmer v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Baker v. DeichmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Linton v. Chestnutt-Gibbons Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API