Legal Opinion

Tummonds v. Moody

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by George Tummonds against Charles P. Moody. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The action was brought upon a promissory note made by tliedefendant; also to recover the amount alleged to be due him for money and notes received by the defendant from other parties to the plaintiff’s use, and for ■ goods and chattels alleged to have been sold' and delivered by the plaintiff to • the defendant. The latter put in issue some of the allegations of the complaint; alleged, by way of counter-claim, an indebtedness to him from the-plaintiff upon promissory notes, and for chattels sold and delivered; also for-moneys paid and services performed by him for the plaintiff. These matters…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake v. TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. De Freest v. BloomingdaleNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. In re the Estate of WinsweilerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. Schuman v. ArshtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API