Legal Opinion

United States v. Vandegrift

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 12, 1929No. 3063Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

On December 12, 1922, appellee imported 47 bales of carbonized wool at the port of Philadelphia. It was entered for warehousing. On May 28, 1923, the entry was liquidated and the merchandise assessed with duty at 33 cents per pound and 20 per centum ad valo-rem under paragraph 1106 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 1106. Wool, and hair of the kinds provided.for in this schedule, which has been advanced in any manner or by any process of manufacture beyond the washed or scoured condition, including tops,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Yardley v. PhillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Bradford Co. v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API