Legal Opinion

Pate v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 25, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Bay County; D. J. Jones, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

—The plaintiffs in error and Press Godwin and Jack Vann, alias Jack Harrell, were indicted by the grand jury of Bay county for the larceny of a “heifer of the bovine species,” alleged to be the property of Watts Gainer, on the third day of August, 1915. At the trial which was held in November, 1915, the jury returned a verdict of guilty as to Marcus and Emmett Pate and Press Godwin, and not guilty as to Jack Vann, alias Jack Harrell.

*98A motion for a new trial in behalf of the three defendants who were convicted was granted as to Press Godwin and denied as to Marcus and Emmett Pate, who are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Gantling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. Whetston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Shidet v. Jules Dreyfuss Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1898

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bessie Cannon v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. McCall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API