Legal Opinion

State v. Midell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2011No. 20100286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appealed from a district court order dismissing a charge of gross sexual imposition against Willie Demar Mi-dell. We reverse, concluding the victim’s testimony was neither implausible nor in*646credible as a matter of law, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

[¶ 2] Willie Demar Midell was charged by information with gross sexual imposition in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03(l)(c). At the preliminary hearing, the complaining witness, S.D.W., testified on behalf of the State. Midell provided the testimony of S.D.W.’s friend,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. NupdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API