Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Meyer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried! below before Groff, J. cited: Robinson v. Uhl, 6 Neb., 333. Jones Chattel Mortgages, 2d Ed., 642. 1 Field’s Lawyers’ Briefs, Sec.. 760. Packard v. Kingman, 11 Iowa, 219.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. J.

This was action in replevin, instituted in the county court of Douglas county, and from which it was appealed' *78to the district court of said county, where a trial was had, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant in error.

Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, brings the cause to this court by proceedings in error.

From the bill of exceptions it appears that on the tenth day of January, 1885, one J. G. Morrisey, who resided in Adair county, Iowa, was indebted to plaintiff in error, in the sum of $150, and to secure which he executed a chattel mortgage upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wasson v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Robison v. UhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Holt v. Spokane & Palouse Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hewitt v. Commercial Banking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fitzgerald v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Crosby v. RitcheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API