Legal Opinion

Dorroh v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1995No. S95A1029PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

Property owners William and Margaret Dorroh sued to stop their neighbor Brian McCarthy from constructing a dock in the navigable tidal waters in coastal Chatham County. The trial court ruled that McCarthy was a riparian owner because his property adjoins the high water mark of the river and that the Department of Natural Resources did not abuse its discretion in allowing equitable access to navigable water in the tidal basin among adjoining waterfront property owners. We agree that the state exercised its discretion reasonably when it adopted an equitable approach…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Georgia v. AshmoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Langley v. MeredithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Rolleston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Wonson v. WonsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Black v. FloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. DBL, INC. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Kelso v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Hitch v. VasarhelyiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API