Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Plesch
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtG-eobge Tilzeb, J.
Defendant Arpad Plesch moves for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens.
The action is founded in conversion and fraud. One of the plaintiffs, Joseph W. Lynch, domiciled and residing in New York State, is alleged to be the assignee of a claim of the estate of Janos Plesch, deceased brother of the defendant. The three remaining plaintiffs are the children and the heirs by will of Janos Plesch. They and the defendant are nonresidents of the State of New York.
The complaint alleges that in 1921 Janos Plesch delivered to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bata v. BataNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- De La Bouillerie v. De VienneNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Chappell v. ChappellNew York Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dietrich v. Texas National Petroleum Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1963
- Lynch v. PleschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960