Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1925No. A-5018PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

From a conviction in the county court of Pawnee county on a charge of selling whisky, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed, assigning as error: First, the cross-examining of defendant concerning other offenses or charges against him for which he had not been convicted; second, in permitting the state to offer evidence in rebuttal of other offenses charged against the defendant for which he had not been convicted.

In the trial of the case, the state used only one witness in chief. The defendant thereupon offered the evidence of the defendant, who denied the sale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Zupon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Fauble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API