Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Hough

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1979No. 6886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUTRER, Judge.

The plaintiff, George Michael Dailey, seeks a declaratory judgment decreeing that Zachary Clayton Hough, a minor child, is presumed to be the legitimate child of Rita Lenore Holloway Hough and Marshall Vernon Hough; that the plaintiff, George Michael Dailey, is not the natural father of the child and thus has no obligation to support and maintain the minor child, Zachary Clayton Hough. Made defendants in this suit were Zachary Clayton Hough, the minor child, Rita Lenore Holloway Hough, and Marshall Vernon Hough.

An attorney was appointed tutor ad hoc to represent the minor child,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Stewart v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GermontoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Prine v. PrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Dailey v. HoughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API