Legal Opinion
Huddleston v. Huddleston
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 2012No. 47,418-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
liThe plaintiff, Darlene Huddleston (“Darlene”), is appealing a judgment that sustained exceptions of prescription filed by the defendants, Richard Fewell, Jr. (“Fewell”), and Ronald Cook (“Cook”), and dismissed her claims against them for damages under the Electronic Surveillance Act, La. R.S. 15:1301 et seq. Because we find that the plaintiffs action is prescribed, we affirm.
FACTS
Darlene filed a petition for damages on December 1, 2008, against Renee D.S. Huddleston (“Renee”) and Joseph A. Tric-hell, Jr. (“Trichell”), alleging violations of the Electronic Surveillance Act. According to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NOSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Ross v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Agem Management Services, LLC v. First Tennessee Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Jackson v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013