Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Alekna Construction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defen*1028dant Stetson-Harza, Inc., also known as Harza Northeast, Inc. (Harza), seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaints and cross claims against it. Harza was hired by third-party defendant Utica City School District to provide architectural and engineering services for construction of a junior high school. Plaintiffs, employees and former employees of Utica City School District, allege that Harza’s negligent design of the air ventilation system resulted in their exposure to CAFCO, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Shellberry v. AlbrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Hammond v. Alekna Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API