Legal Opinion

United States v. Harbison

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 4, 2005No. 05-6907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Herbert Kent Harbison, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for credit for time spent in prior custody pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (2000). Harbison’s claims challenge the execution of his sentence and cannot be brought in the first instance to the district court under § 3585(b). United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 112 S.Ct. 1351, 117 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992). Any challenge to the execution of sentence must be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), after exhaustion of remedies through the Bureau of Prisons. Id. at 335, 112 S.Ct. 1351. We have reviewed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joshua Alexander Hovis v. Bennettsville F.C.I.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026
  2. PATRICK v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
  3. Quadarius Jermaine McIntosh v. United States Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API