Legal Opinion

Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 31, 1913No. 203 (C. C. No. 855)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. Action by Charles A. Strout, trustee, against the United Shoe Machinery Company and others. On demurrer to declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

COLT, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law, brought under section 7 of the Anti-Trust Act of July 2, 1890 (26 Stat. 210, c. 647 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3202]); and the case was heard on demurrer to the declaration. Section 7 reads as follows:

“See. 7. Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act may sue therefor in any Circuit Court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without re*603spect to the amount in controversy, and shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Cilley v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corey v. Independent Ice Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
  2. Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API