Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Union National Bank of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The record herein fails to reflect substantial competent evidence to support the appel-lee’s contention that it incurred attorney’s fees as a result of the appellant’s failure to pay, or delay in paying, the $210,000.00 that appellant owed to appellee by virtue of the default of the borrower. Rather, it is clear from the record that, even if the appellant had immediately paid the $210,000.00 in question, the appellee would have incurred all of the attorney’s fees that it did, in fact, incur because of appellee’s lawsuit against the borrower wherein appellee sought to recover $2.6 million and,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Wendt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998